ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-OR101

Personalized Recommendations for AKI Using a Kidney Action Team: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Session Information

Category: Acute Kidney Injury

  • 102 AKI: Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Aklilu, Abinet Mathias, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Menez, Steven, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Yamamoto, Yu, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Bitzel, Jack, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Corona Villalobos, Celia Pamela, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • O'Connor, Kyle D., Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Shelton, Kyra A., Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Faulkner, Sophia, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Makhijani, Amrita, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Kadhim, Bashar A., Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Parikh, Chirag R., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Wilson, Francis Perry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Background

AKI alerts have not improved patient outcomes but AKI care bundles have. We investigated if timely personalized recommendations for AKI are more effective at improving patient outcomes.

Methods

KAT-AKI was a 1:1 randomized investigator-blinded trial conducted at 2 large US hospital systems, Yale and Johns Hopkins, evaluating the effectiveness of rapid, expert-led diagnosis and management recommendations at creatinine-based AKI diagnosis. A physician and pharmacist “Kidney Action Team”(KAT) screened patients with new AKI at the time of an automated AKI alert that was not visible to clinicians. For patients who passed screening, the KAT remotely reviewed their chart and provided structured recommendations in 5 major categories (general diagnostics, volume, potassium, acidosis, medications). Patients were then randomized to either receive a KAT Recommendation Note in their chart or no KAT Note. The primary clinical outcome was a composite of AKI progression, dialysis or mortality within 14 days. The primary process outcome was proportion of recommendations implemented within 24h of randomization.

Results

The trial included 4003 patients 786(20%) of whom were in an ICU. The median(IQR) age was 72(61-81)yrs, 47% were female and 41% had CKD. The median(IQR) time from automated AKI detection to randomization was 56(33-83)min. Nearly all (96%) had at least one general recommendation and 55% had at least one medication-specific recommendation. The process outcome was significantly higher in the intervention arm (0.25[0-0.50] vs 0[0-0.33], p<0.001). The intervention particularly improved ordering of urinalysis, orthostatic vitals, creatine kinase, obstruction evaluation, AKI documentation and medication changes.(Figure) However, there was no difference in the primary clinical outcome, individual components or post-AKI hospital LOS.(Table)

Conclusion

Personalized early recommendations improved AKI documentation and process outcomes but did not change clinical outcomes.(NCT04040296)

14-day Outcomes
----------------------------------------
Primary composite outcome, n (%)
AKI progression, n (%)
Dialysis, n (%)
Mortality, n (%)
Length of stay, days, median (IQR)
Control
----------
329 (16.5%)
261 (13.1%)
30 (1.5%)
185 (9.2%)
5.2 (2.2, 9.4)
Intervention
-----------------
344 (17.3%)
270 (13.6%)
31 (1.6%)
191 (9.6%)
5.1 (2.1, 10.0)
p-value
------------
0.554
0.722
0.987
0.762
0.760

Funding

  • Other U.S. Government Support