ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO1166

Advancing Community Care and Access to Follow-Up after AKI Hospitalization: The AFTER AKI Randomized Controlled Trial

Session Information

Category: Acute Kidney Injury

  • 102 AKI: Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Pannu, Neesh I., University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Mcbrien, Kerry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Bignell, Coralea, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Benterud, Eleanor C., University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Palechuk, Taylor, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Harrison, Tyrone, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Manns, Braden J., University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • James, Matthew T., University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Gaps in guideline recommended care for CKD are common after AKI.

Methods

In this randomized controlled trial conducted in Alberta, Canada, hospitalized adults with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2 or greater AKI were randomized to a risk-guided, transition of care intervention versus usual discharge practices at hospital discharge. For people in the intervention group, we used a validated risk index to predict risk of severe CKD after AKI to risk stratify patients. People at low risk (<1%) received patient education alone. People at medium risk received additional clinical guidance, provided to their primary care physician. People at high risk (>10%) were referred to Nephrology. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with CKD who were receiving guideline-concordant care at 90 days after discharge based on use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs, statins, and nephrology specialist follow-up. Processes of care and safety were also evaulated.

Results

We recruited 155 patients into the trial; mean (SD) age 60 (15) years, 91 (60%) were male. 90 days after discharge, 99 (64%) participants had CKD defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73m2 or albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) >30 mg/g. The proportion of participants with CKD after hospitalization with AKI who received guideline-concordant care was 59% in the intervention group versus 24% in the usual-care group (absolute risk difference [RD] 35 %, 95% CI, 17 to 53%; P < 0.001; risk ratio 2.47, 95% CI, 1.43 to 4.25). ACE inhibitor or ARB use was higher with the intervention (67 versus 46%, RD 21%, 95% CI, 2-40] %), as was statin use (78 versus 58%, RD 20%, 95% CI, 2 to 38 %). Among 18 (12%) participants with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 at 90 days, the proportion who received nephrology follow-up was also greater with the intervention (73 versus 29%, RD 44, 95% CI, 2 to 87%). The risk of adverse events was similar in the groups, except for hyperkalemia, which was more frequent in the intervention group (15% versus 5%).

Conclusion

A risk-guided intervention for patients with AKI increased CKD-guideline concordant care early after hospital discharge.

Funding

  • Government Support - Non-U.S.