ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO453

Redefining Overweight and Obesity (OW/OB) in a Large Cohort of Patients with ADPKD

Session Information

Category: Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys

  • 1201 Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys: Cystic

Authors

  • Carriazo Julio, Sol Maria, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Dehkharghanian, Taher, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Miranda Cam, Mauricio Alejandro, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Sarie, Yasmina, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Song, Xuewen, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Kline, Timothy L., Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Khowaja, Saima, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Khalili, Korosh, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Pei, York, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Background

Emerging data indicate OW/OB are risk factors for accelerated progression in ADPKD patients. Thus, an accurate diagnosis is crucial to implement appropriate therapeutic measures and avoid unnecessary treatments if not indicated. The traditional BMI formula used to define OW/OB does not take into account the excess of weight attributed to large cystic kidney and liver in ADPKD. Here we define the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ADPKD patients with OW/OB in a large cohort using a formula recommended by KDIGO

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of patients with PKD1 and PKD2 mutations from the Toronto PKD Registry who had clinical and MRI measurements of total kidney volume (TKV) and total liver volume (TLV) was performed. BMI was calculated by the formula: weight (kg)/height (m2)), while estimated BMI (eBMI) was calculated with the formula proposed by KDIGO: adjusted body weight (body weight (kg) - TKV (kg) - TLV (kg) + weight of normal kidneys and liver/ height (m2)

Results

Table 1 shows clinical characteristics of the study cohort (n=693) and subgroups defined by eBMI category. The median weight and BMI pre and post adjustment were 73 kg and 25,1 kg/m2 and 71.8 kg, and 24,3 kg/m2 respectively. A total of 352 (50.7%) patients were initially classified as OW/OB but the number decreased to 314 (45.3%) post adjustment; 10.7% of those initially classified as OW/OB were reclassified as having normal weight, and 80 (11.5%) of the study cohort were classified into a milder BMI category post adjustment

Conclusion

OW/OB are highly prevalent among patients with ADPKD and are associated with worse prognoses. Using eBMI for an accurate diagnosis of OW/OB can help avoid unnecessary treatment for those previously misclassified