Abstract: FR-PO414
Prediction of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Hospitalization Risk in Hemodialysis: Machine Learning vs. Logistic Regression
Session Information
- Hemodialysis Epidemiology and Outcomes
October 25, 2024 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Dialysis
- 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis
Authors
- Lama, Suman Kumar, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
- Larkin, John W., Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
- Chaudhuri, Sheetal, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
- Jiao, Yue, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
- Winter, Anke, Fresenius Medical Care Germany, Bad Homburg, Germany
- Stauss-Grabo, Manuela, Fresenius Medical Care Germany, Bad Homburg, Germany
- Usvyat, Len A., Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
- Hymes, Jeffrey L., Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
- Maddux, Franklin W., Fresenius Medical Care AG, Bad Homburg, Hessen, Germany
- Wheeler, David C., University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Stenvinkel, Peter, Karolinska Universitetsjukhuset Huddinge Njurmedicinska kliniken, Stockholm, Sweden
- Floege, Jürgen, Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Group or Team Name
- On behalf of the INSPIRE Core Group.
Background
Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common bleeding event in dialysis. INSPIRE group aimed to see if machine learning (ML) models (XGBoost and logistic regression) can identify GIB related hospitalization risk in hemodialysis (HD) patients.
Methods
We used data from adult dialysis patients treated for ≥30 days at a kidney care network (Jan2018-Mar2021). GIB hospitalization was defined based on ICD diagnosis codes recorded as primary, secondary, or tertiary discharge reason. Two distinct models were created using XGBoost and logistic regression on same dataset. Performance was evaluated using area under receiver operating curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Data was randomly divided into 60% training, 20% test and 20% validation datasets. We used unseen patients and data in test data to evaluate the performance of the model.
Results
Incidence rate of 180-day GIB hospitalization was 1.12% in our test data. AUROC was 0.74 for XGBoost and 0.68 for logistic regression. XGBoost achieved a specificity of 0.68 and a sensitivity of 0.65, while logistic regression demonstrated a specificity of 0.57 and a sensitivity of 0.69. Both models identified age, distribution in anemia/iron indices, recent all-cause hospitalization and bone mineral metabolism markers as strong predictor.
Conclusion
ML modeling has potential to detect of GIB hospitalization risk in hemodialysis patients. XGBoost model outperforms logistic regression, yet both performed well. The link between bone mineral metabolism markers and GI bleeding was not anticipated and merits further investigation. Additional validation may be required to ensure model reliability before implementation in a clinical setting.
Figure 1 AUROC of GI Bleed model with XGBoost and Logistic Regression model