ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: PUB528

Comparison of Anti-human T-lymphocyte Immunoglobulin (r-ATLG) vs. Anti-thymocyte Globulin (r-ATG) as Induction Agents in Kidney Transplantation: A 5-Year Retrospective, Single-Center, Observational Study

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2102 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Sinha, Vijay Kumar, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Devra, Amit, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Singh, Ravi Kumar, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Pandey, Prashant, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Background

T cell depletion agents, Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (r-ATG) and Anti-Human T-Lymphocyte Immunoglobulin (r-ATLG), are routinely employed as induction therapies in kidney transplantation. This study systematically evaluates the short-term and long-term outcomes of kidney transplants at our center, focusing on the comparative efficacy and safety profiles of these agents.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from kidney transplant recipients treated at a tertiary care hospital in India between 2017 and 2024. A total of 603 patients were included, with 381 receiving ATG and 222 receiving ATLG as induction therapy. All patients were maintained on a standard regimen of triple immunosuppressive therapy. Follow-up assessments included evaluations for graft rejection, infections, development of de novo diseases, and overall graft survival

Results

The mean follow-up duration was 60 months. The mean doses administered were 5.4 ± 1.4 mg/kg for ATLG and 2.37 ± 1.2 mg/kg for ATG. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well-matched between the two groups. HLA matching showed <3/6 in 95 patients (42.7%) with ATLG and in 318 patients (83.4%) with ATG, while >3/6 HLA matching was found in 127 patients (57.2%) with ATLG and 63 patients (16.5%) with ATG. Serum creatinine levels at discharge and during follow-up intervals were comparable between groups. The incidence of de novo diseases was higher in the ATG group (12 cases, 3.1%) compared to the ATLG group (3 cases, 1.3%). However, the incidence of infections was similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

Both ATG and ATLG demonstrated similar efficacy in terms of short-term and long-term graft rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients.

Rejection Analysis between (ATLG and ATG)