Abstract: FR-PO1053
Effects of Sulforaphane Supplementation on Gut Microbiota in Nondialysis-Dependent Patients with CKD
Session Information
- Kidney Nutrition and Metabolism
October 25, 2024 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Health Maintenance, Nutrition, and Metabolism
- 1500 Health Maintenance, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Authors
- Mafra, Denise, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Ribeiro, Marcia Maria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Britto, Isadora, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- de Paiva, Bruna Regis, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardozo, Ludmila Fmf, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- de Almeida, Pedro Ivo Neves, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Santos, Henrique Fragoso dos, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Background
Gut dysbiosis is associated with systemic inflammation and the accumulation of uremic toxins. Sulforaphane isothiocyanate (SFN) is a bioactive compound derived from cruciferous vegetables that may mitigate gut dysbiosis. SFN has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, improving permeability and intestinal function and impacting dysbiosis. This study aimed to explore the effects of SFN supplementation on gut microbiota in patients with CKD.
Methods
This study was a placebo-controlled longitudinal study. The patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which received 400 ug/day of SFN, or the placebo group, which received corn starch for 30 days. We assessed the fecal microbiome using high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons on the Illumina MiSeq platform. The data was processed using the QIIME 2 software package. We calculated the alpha diversity using RStudio and the phyloseq library. We used a network of nodes and edges to represent the genus-level taxa and the correlations between them. We analyzed the co-occurrence patterns using the SparCC algorithm and the SpiecEasi library in R. The PageRank algorithm was used to identify the core members of each microbiome. We performed Kruskal-Wallis and PERMANOVA tests to analyze differences between profiles.
Results
16 patients participated (12 women, age 61.4 ± 11.6 years, BMI 30.1 ± 7.0 kg/m2, and glomerular filtration of 37.4 ± 12.9 mL/min). We constructed gender co-occurrence networks for SFN and placebo groups. After the intervention, the frequency of genera Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria was reduced (Fig 1).
Conclusion
The intervention simplified the co-occurrence network of microbial generation in the gut of non-dialysis CKD patients. Expressing the ability of SFN to modify the diversity of the gut microbiota.
Fig 1. Co-occurrence measures in patients who received SFN
Funding
- Government Support – Non-U.S.