ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO1112

Need and Efficacy of Add-On Opt-Out Strategy to Promote Delivery of Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT)-Directed Comprehensive Pre-ESKD Education (CoPE) for All Patients with Advanced CKD

Session Information

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 2302 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Shell, Popy, VA North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Joyce, Malea, VA North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Scheiffele, Grant D., VA North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Subhash, Shobha, VA North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Lyles, Teresa A., VA North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Jia, Huanguang, VA North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Shukla, Ashutosh M., VA North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, United States
Background

CoPE is a must for informed KRT selection and use; however, only a minority of advanced CKD patients receive CoPE before KRT. We lack evidence-based estimations for patients’ interest for CoPE and effective strategies to facilitate CoPE for all patients with advanced CKD. Mail-inviting eligible patients derived from an electronic health record database can improve advanced CKD identification and aid CoPE dissemination; however, its efficacy has not been tested.

Methods

We conducted secondary analysis of recruitment processes for the ongoing TEACH-VET study aimed to evaluate the benefits of CoPE (vs. usual care) on many patient-level outcomes among Veterans with advanced CKD. TEACH-VET employs a mail-based opt-out strategy; all advanced, stage 4 and 5 CKD patients are extracted from the clinical database, and mail-invited to receive CoPE or usual care (opt-in cohort). Patients not self-responding to study invite within two-week period are actively contacted (opt-out cohort). We examined the rates and efficiency of CoPE interest assessed by enrollment as co-primary outcomes, and successful contact with patients and final randomization as secondary outcomes.

Results

Of the 1130 patients eligible for the opt-in cohort, 90 (8%) enrolled for education with passive, strategy. Significantly higher fraction (n=293, 48%, p<0.001) of the eligible 617 approached through active outreach were enrolled for education. Overall, 77% of all CoPE enrollments required an active outreach. Both, upstream successful contacts (72% vs. 10%, p<0.001) and the downstream randomizations into study (34% vs. 7%, p=0.01) were higher for active outreach group. Subgroup analysis of those successfully contacted with either method showed that enrollments were higher among passive approach (80%), compared to active outreach (66%, p=.02) group. The efficiency of add-on active outreach was significantly better, with time per successful approach 29±8 vs. 169±183 mins, p<.001, per successful enrollment 25.33±11.57 vs. 140.11±157, p<0.001, and randomization 92±34 vs. 319±385, p<0.001, compared to passive strategy.

Conclusion

Adopting a process of active outreach allows higher and more efficient enrollments for the provision of CoPE, necessary for informed KRT decision-making.

Funding

  • Veterans Affairs Support