Abstract: FR-OR49
Renal Denervation Is Effective in Reducing Blood Pressure in Patients with CKD: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Blinded, Investigator-Initiated Trial
Session Information
- Hypertension, CVD, and the Kidneys: Clinical Studies
October 25, 2024 | Location: Room 5, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 05:00 PM - 05:10 PM
Category: Hypertension and CVD
- 1602 Hypertension and CVD: Clinical
Authors
- Kannenkeril, Dennis, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Schmieder, Roland E., University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Böhm, Michael, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
- Mahfoud, Felix, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
- Rump, Lars C., University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Stegbauer, Johannes, University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- van der Giet, Markus, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Schiffer, Mario, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Veelken, Roland, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Uder, Michael, Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Schmid, Axel, Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Background
Arterial hypertension is the predominant driving force of the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is increased in patients with CKD and endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) offers the opportunity to modulate SNS activity and thereby blood pressure and renal outcome.
Methods
In a multicenter prospective randomized sham-controlled clinical trial (clingov:NCT04264403), patients with CKD stage 3 and uncontrolled hypertension despite 1-5 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to either uRDN or a sham procedure. The primary endpoint was the change in mean ambulatory systolic BP (ASBP) at 6 months while on stable medication and blinding maintained. Secondary endpoints were changes of other 24h ambulatory BP values, office BP and safety. Due to slow recruitment, the trial was prematurely stopped.
Results
Of 25 randomized patients (mean age 67yrs), 20 subjects had a 6 month visit per protocol. There was no difference in clinical characteristics, pretreatment 24 hour/day/night ambulatory and office BP between the uRDN (N=10) and the sham group (N=10). After 6 months the decrease in 24h (and day) ambulatory diastolic BP (ADBP) was significantly greater in the uRDN compared with sham (p=0.035 (and 0.030)). There was a numerically greater reduction in 24h ASBP in the uRDN group compared to sham, but it did not reach statistical significance. eGFR did not change within 6 months in either group, albuminuria decreased after 3 months in the uRDN group (p=0.023), with significantly greater decrease compared to sham (p=0.029), but this was not found after 6 months. No safety concerns related to uRDN emerged.
Conclusion
In this randomized sham-controlled blinded study, in face of its premature stop leading to a small cohort, we observed a decrease of diastolic BP after uRDN and no safety signals in these hypertensive patients with CKD.
(all BP in mmHg) | 24h amb. systolic BP pretreatment | 24h amb systolic BP at 6 month | Change from pretretment | p-value vs pre- treatment | 24h amb. diastolic BP pretreatment | 24h amb diastolic BP at 6 month | Change from pretretment | p-value vs pre- treatment |
uRDN | 143 ± 11 | 138 ± 15 | -4.70 ± 8.12 | 0.100 | 82.0 ± 7.8 | 78.5 ± 10.9 | -3.75 ± 5.53 | 0.061 |
Sham | 142 ± 10 | 141 ± 10 | -0.90 ± 9.35 | 0.768 | 85.5 ± 9.0 | 88.9 ± 7.2 | 2.15 ± 6.06 | 0.291 |
p-value uRDN vs sham | 0.748 | 0.641 | 0.170 | - | 0.342 | 0.022 | 0.035 | - |
Funding
- Commercial Support – Recor Medical, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA