Abstract: TH-PO600
Assessing the Utility and Accuracy of Phospholipase A2 Receptor (PLA2R) Antibody in Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Session Information
- Membranous Nephropathy, FSGS, and Minimal Change Disease
October 24, 2024 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Glomerular Diseases
- 1402 Glomerular Diseases: Clinical, Outcomes, and Therapeutics
Authors
- Ragy, Omar Sherin, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Abass, Wessam, University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
- Kanigicherla, Durga Anil K, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Shinkins, Bethany, University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Bestall, Janine, University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
- King, Natalie V., University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
- Brenchley, Paul E., Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Smith, Alison F., University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
- Hamilton, Patrick, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
Background
If used as a first-line triage test to diagnose primary membranous nephropathy, the PLA2R antibody (PLA2R-Ab) test could reduce the proportion of people with nephrotic syndrome needing a kidney biopsy. Evidence to determine an appropriate PLA2R-Ab test threshold, however, is lacking.
Methods
A systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies was conducted to evaluate serum- or urine-based biomarkers to distinguish primary and secondary membranous nephropathy (MN). We searched for relevant articles in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, INAHTA, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Cochrane-recommended systematic review and meta-analysis methodology was implemented. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias.
Results
Eighty-one studies were eligible for inclusion, and 50 were meta-analyzed stratified by PLA2R-Ab test method using either EUROIMMUN Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 44 studies or EUROIMMUN immunofluorescence test (IF) in 29 studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN ELISA at a cut-off value of 20 RU/ml were 0.631 (95% CI: 0.546, 0.709) and 0.955 (95% CI: 0.914, 0.977), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN IF at a threshold of 1:10 were 0.705 (95% CI: 0.653 – 0.752) and 0.986 (95% CI: 0.925 – 0.998), respectively. The risk of bias was higher for studies evaluating EUROIMMUN IF compared to the ELISA test. We also explored whether the timing of the index test had an impact on the pooled diagnostic accuracy results; no significant differences were found.
Conclusion
By comprehensively considering the specificity and sensitivity of EUROIMMUN ELISA PLA2R-Ab, we show that 20 RU/mL could be used as an optimal cut-off value to confirm a diagnosis of MN without the need for kidney biopsy.
Funding
- Government Support – Non-U.S.