Abstract: FR-PO1179
Differences in Plasma Proteomic Profiles between Patients with and without Type 2 Diabetes and CKD: New insights from DAPA-CKD
Session Information
- CKD: Mechanisms - 2
October 25, 2024 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)
- 2303 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Mechanisms
Authors
- De la Rambelje, Mark Andre, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Jongs, Niels, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Greasley, Peter J., AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Ågren, Rasmus, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Hammarstedt, Ann, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sjostrom, David, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Voors, Adriaan A., Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen Afdeling Cardiologie, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Heerspink, Hiddo Jan L., Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Group or Team Name
- DAPA-CKD Biomarker Committee.
Background
The pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D) may share common and distinct pathways. To better understand potential pathophysiological differences between patients with CKD with or without T2D, we compared circulating protein profiles between these two groups.
Methods
We used baseline plasma samples and clinical data from 2485 patients with CKD with and without T2D from the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled DAPA-CKD trial. We used the Olink® Explore 3072 panel with 2941 unique proteins for obtaining biomarker profiles of patients with CKD. We cross-sectionally compared patients with vs. without T2D. Differentially abundance testing was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Pathway analysis was performed with ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA).
Results
The 2485 included patients had a similar eGFR, UACR, and diabetes distribution compared with the overall clinical trial population. Patients with T2D compared with those without T2D were older (64.8 vs. 56.8 years), had a higher eGFR (44.4 vs 41.8 mL/min/1.73m2), and a higher UACR (median 990 vs. 870 mg/g). Patients with T2D compared to those without had higher levels of adhesion G protein-coupled receptor G1, keratin 8, kidney injury marker-1, natriuretic peptide B and interleukin 6 with respectively significant (Bonferroni adjusted p-value < 0.05) fold changes of 2.39, 1.97, 1.74, 1.56, and 1.39. These differentially expressed proteins, along with others, were associated with atherosclerosis signaling and increased inflammation and immune system activity in those with vs without T2D and CKD.
Conclusion
Plasma proteomic profiles of patients with CKD and T2D were revealed to be related to atherosclerosis and increased inflammation and immune system activity compared to CKD patients without T2D. These findings may aid in identifying new treatment targets for patients with diabetic and non-diabetic CKD.
Funding
- Commercial Support – AstraZeneca