ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO298

Gabapentin Use and Adverse Effects among Hemodialysis Patients Diagnosed with Pruritus or Neuropathic Pain in US Claims Data

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Rigatto, Claudio, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Lu, Ting, Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Schaufler, Thilo, Vifor Pharma Management AG, Glattbrugg, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Ruessmann, Despina, Vifor Pharma Management AG, Glattbrugg, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Pisoni, Ronald L., Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Bieber, Brian, Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Karaboyas, Angelo, Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Strupp, Michael, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
Background

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is linked with numerous clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Gabapentin (Gaba) is indicated for neuropathic pain (NP), and also used off-label to reduce pruritus symptoms. There are, however, concerns about adverse events (AEs), namely altered mental status and risk of falls. We explored real-world Gaba utilization patterns and relevant AEs in US hemodialysis (HD) patients, and how they may differ by diagnosis of CKD-aP vs. NP.

Methods

We used claims data from 533,232 adult HD patients in the USRDS database between 2016-2020 with Fee-For-Service Medicare Part D coverage. Gaba use, dose, and time to discontinuation were stratified by time-updated diagnosis of CKD-aP or NP. The associations between time-varying Gaba dose – defined as current prescription updated continuously – and six AEs were analysed by recurrent event Andersen-Gill model and adjusted for potential confounders, separately by time-updated diagnosis of CKD-aP or NP.

Results

Point-prevalence of Gaba prescription was 13.9% overall, and was higher among patients with NP (21.1%) than with CKD-aP (11.0%). Median [IQR] time to discontinuation was 5.2 [2.0, 13.0] months in the NP group and 4.2 [1.5, 11.6] months in the CKD-aP group. Mean Gaba dose was higher (503 vs. 433 mg/day) in the NP vs. CKD-aP group, and increased during the first year of use from 410 to 494 mg/day. AE rates ranged from 9.3 (fracture) to 37.8 (altered mental status) per 100 patient-years. We observed a strong dose-response association between Gaba dose and AEs, particularly among patients with CKD-aP (Table).

Conclusion

Use of Gaba in HD patients was associated with a higher risk of AEs (including altered mental status, dizziness, falls, and fracture), even at doses as low as 100 mg/day. The increase was greater when Gaba was used off-label in CKD-aP patients. Prescribers should consider the clinically relevant side effects of Gaba when providing treatment options to their patients with CKD-aP.

Funding

  • Commercial Support – Commercial support by Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma