ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO439

Emergency-Only Dialysis and the Impact of Transition to Scheduled Dialysis on Survival of Patients with ESKD

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Imber, Jared G., The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston John P and Katherine G McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Molony, Donald A., The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston John P and Katherine G McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Rahbar, Mohammad H., The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Hessabi, Manouchehr, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Yazdani, Akram, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Tahanan, Amirali, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Trivedi, Rekha K., Harris Health System, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Teakell, Jade M., The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston John P and Katherine G McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
Background

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) without access to scheduled dialysis present to emergency departments (ED) when their clinical status deteriorates to the extent that they require hemodialysis (HD) emergently to evade death. We hypothesize that the patients who receive emergency-only HD (EOHD) and are subsequently transitioned to scheduled HD or peritoneal dialysis (PD) will have increased overall survival compared to those patients who continued to receive EOHD.

Methods

We interrogated the electronic medical record of the Harris Health System (Houston, TX) to evaluate health outcomes for all adult patients with ESKD requiring dialysis (identified using ICD-10 codes) from 2017 to 2021. We compared overall survival in an EOHD cohort between patients who were transitioned to scheduled dialysis (HD or PD) and those who continued EOHD.

Results

We evaluated the outcomes for 914 adults diagnosed with ESKD without eligibility for or access to a conventional funding source for outpatient dialysis. Of the identified patients, 516 received EOHD, and 398 transitioned to scheduled dialysis (382 HD, 16 PD). Patients receiving EOHD demonstrated an adjusted hazard ratio of 4.553 (95% CI 2.20-9.34) when followed for ≤1 year, 2.222 (95% CI 1.07-4.60) when followed for 1-3 years (total), and 0.2199 (95% CI 0.08-0.61) when followed 3-5 years (total) (Table 1).

Conclusion

The cohort of patients with ESKD who transitioned from EOHD to scheduled dialysis treatments benefited from improved overall survival compared to the patients who continued to receive EOHD, except for those with a follow-up period of 3-5 years. The observed relative improvement in survival outcomes in the EOHD group with greater than 3 years of follow-up is likely due to a survivor effect. These findings provide further evidence that transitioning patients from emergency-only HD to scheduled dialysis as the standard of care will result in better outcomes in this marginalized group of ESKD patients.

Funding

  • Other NIH Support