Abstract: TH-PO439
Evaluation of the Predictive Ability and Concordance of Prognostic Scores for Rapid Progression in ADPKD: A Multicenter Cohort
Session Information
- Genetic Diseases: Cystic - Therapeutic Investigations and Prognosis
November 02, 2023 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Pennsylvania Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys
- 1201 Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys: Cystic
Authors
- Capelli, Irene, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- Aiello, Valeria, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- Elhassan, Elhussein Aamir Elzein, Beaumont Hospital, Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Dublin, Ireland
- Benson, Katherine A., Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- Cristalli, Carlotta P., IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- Vella, Anna, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- Ciurli, Francesca, Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- Montanari, Francesca, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- La Manna, Gaetano, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- Halbritter, Jan, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Conlon, Peter J., Beaumont Hospital, Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Dublin, Ireland
Background
ADPKD is characterized by the progressive development of bilateral renal cysts, resulting in enlargement of the kidney volume and ESKD. ERK-NET assessed Tolvaptan indications according to 3 algorithmic criteria: total kidney volume (HtTKV) and Mayo Clinic Imaging Class (MCIC), rate of decline in eGFR, and the Predicting Renal Outcome in Polycystic Kidney Disease (PROPKD) score. These scores are alternatively used to define rapid progressor (RP) patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate and improve the concordance of sensitivity and specificity of MCIC and PROPKD predictive abilities for rapid disease progression.
Methods
Data from 3 centers (Bologna, Dublin, Berlin/Leipzig) were assessed. We defined RP with: eGFR slope ≥3 mL/min/1.73m2/ yearly over 4 years, or MCIC classes 1C-D-E, or PROPKD score (7-9). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical parameters. The concordance between MCIC and PROPKD was assessed using Kappa statistics. In PKD1 missense variants, the REVEL score was obtained and treated as a continuous variable; score greater than 0.65 were considered ‘pathogenic’ and regarded as PKD1-truncating variants for PROPKD score calculation.
Results
We evaluated 298 ADPKD patients, demographic and clinical data are summarized in Tab 1. After 4 yr of follow-up, MCIC (p 0,041), HBP (p 0,031), and urological events (p<0.001) result were statistically significant on multivariate analysis (Tab 1).Assessment of RP using PROPKD and MCIC scores yielded Kappa Cohen of 0,149; 47.9% (n=143) were concordant, 49,32 % (n=148) patients identified as RP for MCIC were non- RP for PROPKD, while 2.3% (n=7) of PROPKD score considered RP using PROPKD score were considered non-RP using MCIC classes. Following the reclassification of PKD1 missense variants by REVEL score, K of Cohen improved to 0.174, and PROPKD becomes predictive of RP also at multivariate (p 0.010).
Conclusion
Concordance between scores results low (K of Cohen 0,149). PROPKD is more selective compared to the Mayo. Nevertheless, PROPKD allows the identification of some RP patients excluded from MCIC. The combined use of scoring may increase the ability to identify progressive patients. REVEL score could improve the agreement.