ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2023 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2023, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-PO262

Cancer Screening for Dialysis Patients

Session Information

Category: Onconephrology

  • 1700 Onconephrology

Authors

  • Ng, Wern Lynn, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Calderon Barahona, Gabriela M., UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Girón, Carlos Fernando Ortega Carlos Fernando Ortega Girón, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Calderon Martinez, Evelyn J., UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Cuevas Velazquez, Adan Martin, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Guzman, Adalberto E., UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Afreen, Amna, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Htoo, Moe Pwint Phyu, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Khor, Si Yuan, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
  • Atrash, Anas, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Background

Routine cancer screening is not recommended for end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients due to their high mortality rate. The current status of cancer screening in this population remains uncertain, and routine screening is deemed cost-ineffective. False-positive test outcomes may lead to unwarranted medical interventions, overtreatment, and psychological distress, highlighting the need for careful consideration in implementing such screening measures.

Methods

Among 340 ESRD patients at UPMC Harrisburg, 136 were ineligible, resulting in a cohort of 204 patients. Descriptive analysis reported categorical variables as number (percent). Group differences were assessed using chi-square tests, employing Fisher exact test for frequencies ≤5. A p-value <0.05 indicated statistical significance. SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary NC) was used for all analyses.

Results

Among the cancer screening rates examined, including breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, and cervical cancer, there was no statistically significant difference observed between patients who died from cancer-related causes and those who died from non-cancer related causes. However, it is worth noting that the screening rate for lung cancer displayed a statistically significant difference between these two groups.

Conclusion

Cancer screening in ESRD patients should be tailored on anticipated survival, transplant eligibility, and cancer risk. However, this study is limited by small sample sizes. Larger patient cohorts are needed to provide more representative results. A personalized approach to cancer screening, considering specific risk factors and projected lifespan, is crucial in ESRD patients. Further retrospective studies are necessary.