Abstract: TH-PO731
Race Independent eGFR Equations in Assessing Renal Function in Patients With Liver Disease
Session Information
- Diversity and Equity in Kidney Health - I
November 03, 2022 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Orange County Convention Center‚ West Building
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Diversity and Equity in Kidney Health
- 800 Diversity and Equity in Kidney Health
Authors
- Meeusen, Jeff W., Mayo Clinic Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- Dasari, Surendra, Mayo Clinic Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- Lieske, John C., Mayo Clinic Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- Lemoine, Sandrine, Department Néphrologie, Dialyse, Hypertension et Exploration Fonctionnelle Rénale, Groupement Hospitalier Eduard Herriot, Hospices Civiles de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
- Dubourg, Laurence, Department Néphrologie, Dialyse, Hypertension et Exploration Fonctionnelle Rénale, Groupement Hospitalier Eduard Herriot, Hospices Civiles de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
- Stämmler, Frank, Numares AG, Regensburg, Germany
- Schiffer, Eric, Numares AG, Regensburg, Germany
Background
Renal impairment is commonly associated with liver disease, and the degree of renal dysfunction impacts decisions regarding drug dosing, therapeutic interventions, and suitability for liver transplantation. Altered hemodynamics in liver disease often result in overestimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by creatinine based GFR estimating equations. Recently, we have analytically and clinically validated a novel GFR estimation equation based on serum myoinositol, valine, and creatinine quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with cystatin-C, age and sex (AXINON® GFR(NMR)). We hypothesized that AXINON® GFR(NMR) (GFRNMR) could improve CKD classification in the setting of liver disease.
Methods
We compared GFR estimation equations in a multicenter retrospective study of patients (n=203) with liver disease and renal tracer clearance measured GFR (mGFR). Stored serum was analyzed and used to estimate GFR based on GFRNMR, CKD-EPI 2021 eGFRcr-cys, and CKD-EPI 2021 eGFRcr.
Results
eGFRcr overestimated mGFR with a mean bias of 7.5 [4.9 - 9.8] mL/min/1.73m2 compared to a smaller bias of -2.9 [-4.8 - -1.3] for eGFRcr-cys and -1.64 [-3.43 - 0.16] for GFRNMR (both p<0.001). P30 was similar in GFRNMR and eGFRcr-cys (83% [79 - 89] and 86% [81 - 90]) but lower for eGFRcr (74% [68 – 80]). P15 was highest for GFRNMR at 59% [53 - 65] compared to 47% [40 - 53] for eGFRcr and 54% [47 - 61] for eGFRcr-cys. Concordant classification by mGFR CKD stage was 104 (51%), 109 (54%), and 120 (59%), for eGFRcr, eGFRcr-cys, and GFRNMR respectively (GFRNMR vs. eGFRcr: p = 0.074; GFRNMR vs. eGFRcr-cys: p = 0.138; eGFRcr vs. eGFRcr-cys: p = 0.588).
Conclusion
Our findings confirm that the new 2021 eGFRcr equation overestimates GFR among patients with liver disease, presumably due to reduced muscle mass. Addition of myoinositol and valine improved correlation of GFRNMR with mGFR and accurately stratified liver disease patients into CKD stages.