ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO047

Economic Impacts of Alternative Kidney Transplant Immunosuppression: A National Cohort Study

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1802 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Lentine, Krista L., Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Axelrod, David A., Lahey Hospital and Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
  • Dharnidharka, Vikas R., Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Xiao, Huiling, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Brennan, Daniel C., Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Segev, Dorry L., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Ouseph, Rosemary, St Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Randall, Henry B., SSM Health/SLUH, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Naik, Abhijit S., Unviersity of Michign, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Lam, Ngan, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Alhamad, Tarek, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Kasiske, Bertram L., Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Hess, Gregory P., LDI University of Pennsylvania/Symphony Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Schnitzler, Mark, Saint Louis Univ, St Louis, Missouri, United States
Background

Economic outcomes are increasingly considered along with clinical efficacy to guide choice of alternative therapies. We examined the cost impact of kidney transplant (KTx) induction and maintenance suppression (ISx) in a large national US cohort.

Methods

Cost data for the transplant hospitalization were drawn from linkage of the SRTR registry with financial records from the University HealthSystem Consortium of US academic hospitals (2002 –2013, N= 62,002 KTx). Cost of post-transplant care were estimated from Medicare Part A &B payments (N= 62,698). Marginal costs of induction (all periods) and maintenance (Yr 1, Yr 2, Yr 3) ISx were estimated from multivariate regression, including adjustment for baseline recipient, donor, and transplant factors.

Results

Compared to IL2rAb, Thymoglobulin (TMG, $10,066) and other induction ($21,627) was associated with increased costs of the transplant hospitalization, while Campath was initially cost saving ($4,208 . Subsequently, patients induced with TMG had significantly lower costs in Yr1 ($2,108) and Yr 2 ($1,834) post-KTx.

Compared to triple maintenance ISx, steroid-free recipients incurred lower costs in Yr 1 ($4,011), while all other maintenance regimens were associated with higher costs in Yr 1. Patients who received mTORi-based and CsA-based ISx continued to incur higher costs in Yrs 2 and 3 post-KTx. (Figure)

Conclusion

Induction and maintenance ISx are associated with differential costs of care during the transplant hospitalization and post-transplant periods, which may be mediated by different complication rates. Initial higher costs of TMG induction appear to be followed by later cost savings

Funding

  • NIDDK Support