ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO842

Association Between Urine Output, Furosemide Stress Test, and Fibrosis in Kidney Biopsies

Session Information

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 1903 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Mechanisms

Authors

  • Martinez, Jesus Arturo Rivero, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Tlalpan, DIStrito federal, Mexico
  • Chawla, Lakhmir S., University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
  • Mehta, Ravindra L., University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
  • Vaingankar, Sucheta M., University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
  • Rodríguez, Francisco, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Tlalpan, DIStrito federal, Mexico
  • Soto, Virgilia, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Tlalpan, DIStrito federal, Mexico
  • Camacho briseño, María Fernanda, UNAM, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Duarte, Ricardo, Public, MEXICO CITY, Mexico
  • Cabrera-Jara, Alejandro, UNAM, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Garza-Garcia, Carlos Alberto, Private Practice , Monterrey, DIStrito federal, Mexico
  • Madero, Magdalena, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Tlalpan, DIStrito federal, Mexico
Background

Interstitial fibrosis (IF) is one of the most potent risk factors for kidney disease progression. The Furosemide Stress Test (FST) is a validated tool that predicts the severity of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. To our knowledge there is no data on the association between the functional tubular capacity by urine output (UO) and FST with IF on kidney biopsies. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between UO, FST and the severity of IF in kidney biopsies

Methods


84 patients that underwent kidney biopsy were included. Furosemde was administred at 1 mg/kg and UO was measured every h for 6 after confirmation of empty bladder by US. Serum biochemical markers were measured and urine concentrations of furosemide at different times (2, 4 and 6 hours). IF was evaluated by subjective visualization by an experienced nephropathologist in addition to morphometry. We used the FEM equation to determine the Mass of Excretion of Furosemide (FEM: Furosemide Urine x Volume urinary)/furosemide administered dose). Values were expressed as mean, SD or % and Pearson Correlation

Results

Nephrotic syndrome and acute kidney graft dysfunction were the most frequent indications for biopsy. eGFR was inversely proportional to the degree of fibrosis. Subjects with grade 3 IF showed a significant decrease in urine volume at hour 1 when compared with grades I and II (155 mL ± 181 vs 316 mL ± 261 vs 328 mL ± 352 p=0.015 respectively). Likewise, the total urine volume and the excreted mass of Furosemide was progressively lower with higher degrees of IF, at 2 and 4 hours. An inversely proportional linear correlation between uresis and the degree of IF (R20.072) was observed

Conclusion

Our findings support that IF correlates with total UO and FEM. Both urine output and FST acould be a non invasive tool to predict IF.

Funding

  • Veterans Affairs Support