Abstract: SA-PO914
Survey of Patient Awareness of and Attitudes Towards Home Dialysis in New York City
Session Information
- Dialysis: Home Hemodialysis
October 27, 2018 | Location: Exhibit Hall, San Diego Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Dialysis
- 702 Dialysis: Home Hemodialysis
Authors
- Liu, Frank, Rogosin Institute, New York, New York, United States
- Epstein, David L., Rogosin Institute, New York, New York, United States
- Levine, Daniel, Rogosin Institute, New York, New York, United States
- Baskharoun, Samuel, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Lin, Jonathan T., Rogosin Institute, New York, New York, United States
- Gutgarts, Victoria, NYP-Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States
- Phillips, Molly R., Rogosin Institute, New York, New York, United States
- Farrukh, Omar, NYP-Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States
- Lamba, Perola, NYP-Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States
- Srisung, Weeraporn, NYP-Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States
- Parker, Thomas, Rogosin Institute, New York, New York, United States
- Guo, Xunxi Susan, NYP-Weill Cornell, New York, New York, United States
- Perlman, Alan, Rogosin Institute, New York, New York, United States
Background
Since 2008, CMS regulations have obligated dialysis practitioners to inform in-unit hemodialysis(HD) patients about alternatives to in-unit HD, including home dialysis modalities. Despite this mandate, home dialysis remains underutilized nationwide with just 8.6% of prevalent patients performing any home modality. Home modalities are even more disproportionately underutilized in New York City (NYC), with only 3.6% of patients using a home modality. Because of the unique challenges faced by patients living an intensely urban setting such as NYC, we attempted to understand the factors that might be responsible for that underutilization.
Methods
The PRIMARY CARES (Primary Care Attitudes and Renal Replacement Selection) survey was performed in 7 HD units in the NYC area representing a diverse population of ethnicities, languages, and socioeconomic categories with the objective of assessing factors influencing the utilization of home dialysis.
Results
832 in-unit HD patients were approached and 511 completed the survey. Of these, 469 (92%) indicated they received education regarding any renal replacement modality. Of those, only 180 (35%) reported having been educated about home hemodialysis (HHD) and only 142 (28%) reported having been educated about peritoneal dialysis (PD). Of the 180 patients educated about HHD, 39 (21.7%) seriously considered the modality after receiving education. Only 5 (12.8%) of the 39 patients who seriously considered HHD came to the conclusion they “would never do HHD”. Of the 142 patients educated about PD, 61 (43%) seriously considered the modality after receiving education. Only 11 (18%) of patients who seriously considered PD came to the conclusion they “would never do PD”.
Conclusion
Patient awareness of home modalities remains poor despite mandated modalities education. A significant proportion of patients educated about home modalities seriously considered dialyzing at home, whereas only a small minority indicated they would never consider dialyzing at home after receiving that education. Our data suggests that there may be a large reservoir of home dialysis patients within the NYC in-unit HD population, and that current in-unit modalities education programs could be improved.